A call to reality

  Chapter 9 The reconsideration of Hebrews 1:8, 10-12   A textual critic wrote that in Acts 16:7 would be four textual variations:   For example, in Acts 16:7 would be four textual variations: 1. πνεῦμα Ἰησοῦ Spirit of Jesus: Papyrus p74, p72, Codex Sinaiticus (א), Codex Vaticanus (B), Codex Alexandrinus (A), corrected Ephraemi Rescriptus (C), Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis (D), Cyrill of Alexandria, Vulgate Latin, Syriac, and Ethiopic versions   2. The Spirit of the Lord: Bohairic Coptic and original Ephraemi Rescriptus)   3. the Holy Spirit   4. πνεῦμα Spirit: (Textus Receptus, Byzantine Lectionary, Efrem the Syriac, Chrisostom).   Why so many textual variations and for what reason? It is not strange? According to the context of the Bible, the right version is "the spirit" as in Acts 5:9, Acts 8:39, means an angel of God guides them as in Acts 8:29, Acts 10:19, Acts 11:12, Acts 16: 9. The spirit of Jesus is unique in ...

  Chapter 8 T he real text of Matthew 28:18,19   Before tackling the issue of the forgery in Hebrews chapter 1, we will show the falsification of the text in Matthew 28:18,19, which before the forgery reads as follows:   18 And Jesus, approaching, spoke unto them, saying, All authority was given to me in heaven and on earth. As my Father sent me, I also send you: 19 Go and make disciples of all nations in my name, 20 Teaching them to keep all that I have commanded you! And, behold, I am with you all the days, unto the end of the world. Important notes   The text of Shem Tob version omit s "in Galilee" (Matthew 28:7), which shows that originally , the angel did not refer to walking in Galilee, but only promised a meeting with Jesus. Then, Christ remembers Galilee (Matthew 28:10), but it is rather a sort of walking, a sort of going to a common meeting. Unfortunately, the early translators of the Hebrew autograph or Aramaic translation, at that time...

  Chapter 7 How did they do that?   Long time before the Council of Nicaea (325) was the Council of Antioch, in 267 A.D. At this council the doctrine of the trinity proposed by Sabellius was discussed. This Council is unknown and many do not know what decisions were made there. It is astonishing that what was proposed many years later at Nicaea, was also proposed at this council, but was rejected. The Greek term "homoousios" favored by Sabellius, but rejected at Antioch, ironically, was later favored at the Council of Nicaea.   Sabellius was a third-century theologian. His Trinitarian theology is identical to the one we read in the Apocryphon of John, so the question arises whether he or one of his disciples is the author of this falsehood. Many did not know his excommunication from 220 at Rome and as Sabellius' theology became popular, a Council examining this teaching was convened in Antioch in 267 AD.   At the Council of Antioch in 267 the church ...